From e54a17fe254c21af7afd48348e5adaf9e3af468e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Harvey Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 20:58:37 +1000 Subject: document some community feedback --- README.md | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) (limited to 'README.md') diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 26fdde0..cb14429 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -192,3 +192,14 @@ Where the address does already exist, but is missing some `addr:*` tags, the new - Tracking new Vicmap addresses - Monitoring changes over time + +## Community Feedback + +Consultation with the local community on talk-au at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-May/014622.html determined: + +- Including full address attributes (`addr:suburb`, `addr:state`, `addr:postcode`), even when they could be derived from existing boundaries. +- Existing interpolation way addresses to be replaced with individually mapped address nodes. +- Imported addresses as lone address nodes, not merged onto existing buildings or other objects. +- Using `addr:suburb` as a catch-all for the placename/suburb/locality of the address, irrespective of if the value is actually referring to an OSM `place=suburb` or `place=town` or `place=hamlet` etc. (see page 25, section 15 of https://auspost.com.au/content/dam/auspost_corp/media/documents/australia-post-addressing-standards-1999.pdf) + +This is based on discussions to date, any of these points can be further discussed if needed. -- cgit v1.2.3