From 23a7b0321d57e8bed5424d8637982eb9685d60ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yuchen Pei Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:11:14 +0100 Subject: minor edit --- posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md') diff --git a/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md b/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md index b6b38cb..c9ada5b 100644 --- a/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md +++ b/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md @@ -298,8 +298,8 @@ A bigger question is: how effective is SHAP? Evaluating SHAP --------------- -The quest of the SHAP paper can be decoupled into two independent components. -The niceties of Shapley values and the choice of the coalitional game $v$. +The quest of the SHAP paper can be decoupled into two independent components: +the niceties of Shapley values and the choice of the coalitional game $v$. The SHAP paper argues that Shapley values $\phi_i(v)$ are a good measurement because they are the only values satisfying the some nice properties including the Efficiency -- cgit v1.2.3