From da51d3fbbdf2cbf9fee196682235060f31781c1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yuchen Pei Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:38:56 +0200 Subject: minor edits --- posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'posts') diff --git a/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md b/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md index 93f9fd8..e0acb64 100644 --- a/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md +++ b/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- template: post -date: 2018-04-13 +date: 2018-04-28 title: Updates on open research --- @@ -64,4 +64,4 @@ During the workshop many efforts for open research were mentioned, and afterward In a conversation during the workshop, one of the participants called open science "normal science", because reproducibility, open access, collaborations, and fair attributions are all what science is supposed to be, and practices like treating the readers as buyers rather than users should be called "bad science", rather than "closed science". -To which an organiser replied: maybe we should rename the workshop to "Not-bad science". \ No newline at end of file +To which an organiser replied: maybe we should rename the workshop "Not-bad science". \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3