From db786e35abb644d83f78c21e8c4f10e1d6568a5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yuchen Pei Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:10:58 +0200 Subject: changed layout of blog.html - cut post length on blog.html to synopsis, defaulted to one paragraph long - edited engine accordingly --- site/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'site/posts') diff --git a/site/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.html b/site/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.html index edfcb39..b9b8d98 100644 --- a/site/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.html +++ b/site/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.html @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@

Updates on open research

-

Posted on 2018-04-29

+

Posted on 2018-04-29 | Comments

It has been 9 months since I last wrote about open (maths) research. Since then two things happened which prompted me to write an update.

As always I discuss open research only in mathematics, not because I think it should not be applied to other disciplines, but simply because I do not have experience nor sufficient interests in non-mathematical subjects.

First, I read about Richard Stallman the founder of the free software movement, in his biography by Sam Williams and his own collection of essays Free software, free society, from which I learned a bit more about the context and philosophy of free software and its relation to that of open source software. For anyone interested in open research, I highly recommend having a look at these two books. I am also reading Levy’s Hackers, which documented the development of the hacker culture predating Stallman. I can see the connection of ideas from the hacker ethic to the free software philosophy and to the open source philosophy. My guess is that the software world is fortunate to have pioneers who advocated for various kinds of freedom and openness from the beginning, whereas for academia which has a much longer history, credit protection has always been a bigger concern.

-- cgit v1.2.3