diff options
| author | simonmar <unknown> | 2003-04-25 11:17:55 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | simonmar <unknown> | 2003-04-25 11:17:55 +0000 |
| commit | de886f789c38748bcad8ef0c8e518865c759f814 (patch) | |
| tree | 45a6121d0f7360dc3d1da94e1b4a5b0eecc089d0 /TODO | |
| parent | eb12972c9b217d46397791c63d19c418b1a3c83f (diff) | |
[haddock @ 2003-04-25 11:17:55 by simonmar]
Some updates, including moving the derived instance item down to the
bottom of the list now that Ross has contributed some code that does
the job for common cases.
Diffstat (limited to 'TODO')
| -rw-r--r-- | TODO | 27 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 2 deletions
@@ -1,12 +1,11 @@ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- bugs + * don't link to M.x if M.x is re-exported via a 'module N' from module M. * Pick the preferred export names as per the paper. -* instances: need to construct instances for deriving clauses, somehow. - * A module re-export should only reference the target module if the target module is imported without hiding any of its exports (otherwise we should inline just the exported bits). @@ -23,9 +22,31 @@ * Document new labelling feature +* For a module with no documentation section, include a "synopsis" header? + +* Parent button should be removed if there isn't a parent. + +* a paragraph like + + > text + more text + + is interpreted strangely: the second line is interpreted as part of the + code block, but the second line is non-literal (and markup within it + is interpreted normally). Rewrite the lexer using Alex, and fix this + at the same time. + +* derived instance support isn't quite right (doing it properly is + hard, though). + ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- features +* merge the indices, adding annotations to distinguish types/classes/functions/ + constructors as necessary. + +* nested itemized and enumerated lists. + * There ought to be a way to include some structure in the "description" (section headings, etc.) and possibly in other comments. (suggseted by Daan). @@ -64,6 +85,8 @@ * Allow individual function arguments to be documented when the function type is a record element? +* hiding instances? + ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- cosmetic |