aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/markup.rst
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Constructor and pattern synonym argument docs (#709)Alec Theriault2018-01-131-0/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Support Haddocks on constructor arguments This is in conjunction with https://phabricator.haskell.org/D4094. Adds support for rendering Haddock's on (non-record) constructor arguments, both for regular and GADT constructors. * Support haddocks on pattern synonym arguments It appears that GHC already parsed these - we just weren't using them. In the process of doing this, I tried to deduplicate some code around handling patterns. * Update the markup guide Add some information about the new support for commenting constructor arguments, and mention pattern synonyms and GADT-style constructors. * Overhaul LaTeX support for data/pattern decls This includes at least * fixing several bugs that resulted in invalid LaTeX * fixing GADT data declaration headers * overhaul handling of record fields * overhaul handling of GADT constructors * overhaul handling of bundled patterns * add support for constructor argument docs * Support GADT record constructors This means changes what existing HTML docs look like. As for LaTeX, looks like GADT records were never even supported. Now they are. * Clean up code/comments Made code/comments consistent between the LaTeX and XHTML backend when possible. * Update changelog * Patch post-rebase regressions * Another post-rebase change We want return values to be documentable on record GADT constructors.
* Improve documenation of Haddock markup (#614)Nathan Collins2017-05-111-93/+357
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Improve documentation of Haddock markup. - document that Haddock supports inferring types top-level functions with without type signatures, but also explain why using this feature is discouraged. Looks like this feature has been around since version 2.0.0.0 in 2008! - rework the "Module description" section: - move the general discussion of field formatting to the section intro and add examples illustrating the prose for multiline fields. - mention that newlines are preserved in some multiline fields, but not in others (I also noticed that commas in the `Copyright` field are not preserved; I'll look into this bug later). - add a subsection for the module description fields documentation, and put the field keywords in code formatting (double back ticks) instead of double quotes, to be consistent with the typesetting of keywords in other parts of the documentation. - mention that "Named chunks" are not supported in the long-form "Module description" documentation. - fix formatting of keywords in the "Module attributes" section. Perhaps these errors were left over from an automatic translation to ReST from some other format as part of the transition to using Sphinx for Haddock documentation? Also, add a missing reference here; it just said "See ?"! - update footnote about special treatment for re-exporting partially imported modules not being implemented. In my tests it's not implemented at all -- I tried re-exporting both `import B hiding (f)` and `import B (a, b)` style partial imports, and in both cases got the same result as with full imports `import B`: I only get a module reference. * Rework the `Controlling the documentation structure` section. My main goal was to better explain how to use Haddock without an export list, since that's my most common use case, but I hope I improved the section overall: - remove the incomplete `Omitting the export list` section and fold it into the other sections. In particular, summarize the differences between using and not using an export list -- i.e. control over what and in what order is documented -- in the section lead. - add "realistic" examples that use the structure markup, both with and without an export list. I wanted a realistic example here to capture how it can be useful to explain the relationship between a group of functions in a section, in addition to documenting their individual APIs. - make it clear that you can associate documentation chunks with documentation sections when you aren't using an export list, and that doing it in the most obvious way -- i.e. with `-- |`, as you can in the export list -- doesn't work without an export list. It took me a while to figure this out the first time, since the docs didn't explain it at all before. - add a "no export list" example to the section header section. - add more cross references. * Add examples of gotchas for markup in `@...@`. I'm not sure this will help anyone, since I think most people first learn about `@...@` by reading other people's Haddocks, but I've documented the mistakes which I've made and then gotten confused by. * Use consistent Capitalization of Titles. Some titles were in usual title caps, and others only had the first word capitalized. I chose making them all use title caps because that seems to make the cross references look better.
* Add $ as a special characterOmari Norman2016-06-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | If this character is not escaped, documentation built with Haddock 2.17.2 will fail. This was not an issue with 2.16 series, which causes builds to fail and there is nothing in the docs or error message giving a clue about why builds that used to succeed now don't.
* Fix math typo and add link.Dominic Steinitz2016-06-091-2/+2
|
* Camel case MathJax.Dominic Steinitz2016-06-091-1/+1
|
* Fix spelling mistake.Dominic Steinitz2016-06-091-1/+1
|
* Documentation for LaTeX markup.Dominic Steinitz2016-06-091-0/+15
|
* doc: Switch to SphinxBen Gamari2016-02-081-0/+887