| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Correspondingly, we wrap all inline/diplay math in
<span class="mathjax"> ... the math .... </span>
This fixes #959.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Indicate source module of instances
Above instance, we now also display a link to the module where the
instance was defined. This is sometimes helpful in figuring out
what to import.
* Source module for type/data families too
* Remove parens
* Accept tests
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Remove unnecessary call to 'collapseSection'
The call is unnecessary since there is no corresponding toggle for hiding the
section of orphan instances.
* Use <details> for collapsibles
This makes them work even when JS is disabled. Closes #560.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Add compile step that bundles and compresses JS files
Also, manage dependencies on third-party JS libraries using NPM.
* Compile JS from TypeScript
* Enable 'noImplicitAny' in TypeScript
* QuickJump: use JSX syntax
* Generate source maps from TypeScript for easier debugging
* TypeScript: more accurate type
* Separate quick jump css file from ocean theme
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
18ed871afb82560d5433b2f53e31b4db9353a74e switched to a new MathJax URL
but didn't update the tests.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
This fixes bug #294.
This also fixes a related but never-before-mentioned bug about the
display of GADT record selectors with non-polymorphic type signatures.
Note: Associated data type constructors fail to show up if nothing is
exported that they could be attached to. Exporting any of the data types
in the instance head, or the class + data family itself, causes them to
show up, but in the absence of either of these, exporting just the
associated data type with the constructor itself will result in it
being hidden.
The only scenario I can come up that would involve this kind of
situation involved OverlappingInstances, and even then it can be
mitigated by just exporting the class itself, so I'm not going to solve
it since the logic would most likely be very complicated.
|