| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test actually tests what #260 originally reported - I omitted the
RankNTypes scenario from the original fix because I realized it's not
relevant to the underlying issue and indeed, this renders as intended
now. Still good to have more tests.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This drops them to the new precedence pREC_CTX, which makes single
eqaulity constraints show up as (a ~ b) => ty, in line with GHC's
rendering. Additional tests added to make sure other type operators
render as intended. Current behavior matches GHC
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This introduces a new precedence level for single contexts (because
implicit param contexts always need parens around them, but other types
of contexts don't necessarily, even when alone)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The parsing of these seems to have been fixed by GHC folk and it now
renders differently. IMHO it now renders in a better way so I'm updating
the test to reflect this.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes bird tracks in the form
> foo
> bar
> bat
parse as if they had been written as
>foo
>bar
>bat
ie. without the leading whitespace in front of every line.
Ideally we also want to look into how leading whitespace affects code
blocks written using the @ @ syntax, which are currently unaffected by
this patch.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These should show up in every place where the class is visible, and
indeed they do right now.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This just tests various stuff including poly-kinded patterns and
operator patterns to make sure the rendering isn't broken.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This now displays them as (==) k a b c ... to mirror GHC's behavior,
instead of the old (k == a) b c ... which was just wrong.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for type/data families with their respective
instances, as well as closed type families and associated type/data
families.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
the context
The basic idea is that "a" and "+" are either pretty-printed as "a" and "(+)" or "`a`" and "+"
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This updates tests due to Haddock Trac #271 fix and due to removal of
TypeHoles as an extension from GHC.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The nesting rules are similar to Markdown's with the exception that we
can not simply indent the first line of a hard wrapped indented
paragraph and have it treated as if it was fully indented. The reason is
differences in markup as some of our constructs care about whitespace
while others just swallow everything up so it's just a lot easier to not
bother with it rather than making arbitrary rules.
Note that we now drop trailing for string entities inside of lists. They
weren't needed and it makes the output look uniform whether we use a
single or double newline between list elements.
Conflicts:
src/Haddock/Parser.hs
test/Haddock/ParserSpec.hs
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Any extensions that are not enabled by a used language (Haskell2010
&c) will be shown. Furthermore, any implicitly enabled are also going
to be shown. While we could eliminate this either by using the GHC API
or a dirty hack, I opted not to: if a user doesn't want the implied
flags to show, they are recommended to use enable extensions more
carefully or individually. Perhaps this will encourage users to not
enable the most powerful flags needlessly. Enabled with show-extensions.
Conflicts:
src/Haddock/InterfaceFile.hs
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Conflicts:
src/Haddock/Backends/Hoogle.hs
src/Haddock/Interface/Rename.hs
src/Haddock/Parser.hs
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also simplify specs and parsers while we're at it. Some parsers were
made more generic.
This commit is a part of GHC pre-merge squash, email
fuuzetsu@fuuzetsu.co.uk if you need the full commit history.
|
| |
|
|
| |
We also check that we have parsed everything with endOfInput.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We remove the HTML test as it is no longer necessary. We cover the
test case in spec tests and other HTML tests but keeping this around
fails: this is because the new parser has different semantics there.
In fact, I suspect the original behaviour was a bug that wasn't
caught/fixed but simply included as-is during the testing.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
