| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
| |
These are unecessary anyway and just blow up interface size
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Haddock support for bundled pattern synonyms
* Add fixities to bundled pattern synonyms
* Add bundled pattern synonyms to the synopsis
* Store bundled pattern fixities in expItemFixities
* Add test for bundled pattern synonyms
* Stop threading fixities
* Include bundled pattern synonyms for re-exported data types
Sadly, fixity information isn't found for re-exported data types
* Support for pattern synonyms
* Modify tests after #631
* Test some reexport variations
* Also lookup bundled pattern synonyms from `InstalledInterface`s
* Check isExported for bundled pattern synonyms
* Pattern synonym is exported check
* Always look for pattern synonyms in the current module
Another overlooked cornercase
* Account for types named twice in export lists
Also introduce a fast function for nubbing on a `Name` and use it
throughout the code base.
* correct fixities for reexported pattern synonyms
* Fuse concatMap and map
* Remove obsolete import
* Add pattern synonyms to visible exports
* Fix test
* Remove corner case
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
18ed871afb82560d5433b2f53e31b4db9353a74e switched to a new MathJax URL
but didn't update the tests.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Fix #280. Parsing of module header
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The initial newlines were counted as indentation spaces, thus disturbing the parsing of next lines
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Frames are a bit broken, ignored by Hackage, and considered obsolete in general.
This patch disables frames generation. The mini_*.html files are still used in the synopsis.
|
|/
|
|
|
| |
The "Produced by Haddock" footer was overlapping the page's body when printing.
This patch hides the footer with a css media rule.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Change notation and add support for inline math.
Allow newlines in display math.
Add a command line option for the mathjax url (you might want to use a
locally installed version).
Rebase tests because of extra url and version change.
Respond to (some of the) comments.
Fix warnings in InterfaceFile.hs
|
| | |
|
|/ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #412
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I delete the old tests because it turns out that:
* test runner would never put them in scope of each other even with
imports so just one would suffice
* test runner actually needed some hacking to keep links so in the end
we would end up with no anchors making them useless
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Test: a correct behaviour for fields comma-separating values. I'm
surprised we had no bug open for this. Maybe it affects how #301 renders
now but I doubt.
Operators: Seems GHC is giving us a new order for operators, something
must have changed on their side again. cc @haasn , this makes the fixity
to the side not match the order on the LHS which is a bit unpleasant.
Maybe the fixity can be made to match the GHC order?
Bug335: We expand examples by default now.
Bug310: Now inferred safe.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Conflicts:
haddock-api/src/Haddock/Backends/Xhtml/Decl.hs
haddock-api/src/Haddock/Convert.hs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we only use it only for ‘since’ annotations but with these
patches it should be fairly simple to add new attributes if we wish to.
Closes #26. It seems to work fine but due to 7.10 rush I don't have the
chance to do more exhaustive testing right now. The way the meta is
output (emphasis at the end of the whole comment) is fairly arbitrary
and subject to bikeshedding.
Note that this makes test for Bug310 fail due to interface version bump:
it can't find the docs for base with this interface version so it fails.
There is not much we can do to help this because it tests for ’built-in’
identifier, not something we can provide ourselves.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #310
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes #335
|
|
|
|
| |
This also fixes #86.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was long overdue, now running ./accept.lhs on a clean test from
master will not generate a bunch of changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because the change is in GHC 7.9 and we now work against 7.8.3, this
test no longer makes sense. We revert it until 7.10 becomes the standard
version. If anything, there should be a test for this in GHC itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I get rid of the Monoid instance because we weren't satisfying the laws.
Convenience of having <> didn't outweigh the shock-factor of having it
behave badly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The benefit of this is that the ‘top-level’ element of such lists is
properly wrapped in <p> tags so any CSS working with these will be
applied properly. It also just makes more sense.
Pointed out at jgm/pandoc#1346.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I can not remember why they were wrapped in paragraphs to begin with and
it seems unnecessary now that I test it. Closes #307.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #298.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The order of signature groups has been corrected upstream. Here we add a
test case and update some existing test-cases to reflect this change. We
remove grouped signature in test cases that we can (Minimal,
BugDeprecated &c) so that the test is as self-contained as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes bug #294.
This also fixes a related but never-before-mentioned bug about the
display of GADT record selectors with non-polymorphic type signatures.
Note: Associated data type constructors fail to show up if nothing is
exported that they could be attached to. Exporting any of the data types
in the instance head, or the class + data family itself, causes them to
show up, but in the absence of either of these, exporting just the
associated data type with the constructor itself will result in it
being hidden.
The only scenario I can come up that would involve this kind of
situation involved OverlappingInstances, and even then it can be
mitigated by just exporting the class itself, so I'm not going to solve
it since the logic would most likely be very complicated.
|