| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | | | |
Fix mark read logic
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |/ / / / / / / / /
| | |/| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | |/ / / / / / /
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Instead of saying
(field-a
field-b
object-a.subfield
field-c
object-b.subfield-a object-b.subfield-b)
you can rather say
(field-a
field-b
(object-a subfield)
field-c
(object-b subfield-a subfield-b))
To avoid a dependency loop, sx-browse-filter has been moved to
sx-filter.el.
|
| | | | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Get all items
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
This test is largely unneeded and (currently) almost doubles the test
time.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See eeb327e3af94e1118218c129916b8f7165e835ef.
|
| | | | | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|/ / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | | | |
Introduce tags
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Search
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Branch: search
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Branch: search
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Implement inbox
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In accordance with d51791fb6ae69e3b426f7d598920b4349858908f
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / / / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
sx-question.el
sx.el
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This is to avoid a bug in package.el which only gets fixed in Emacs 25
Unfortunately, there's no safe way to use a new feature offered by a
previously defined macro, because files were not reloaded on upgrade.
After a couple of weeks, once we can expect most of our users to have
restarted Emacs at least once since the last upgrade, we can start
relying on this new feature.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Syntax introduced in commits:
* d51791fb6ae69e3b426f7d598920b4349858908f
* 5225bd4ae6e26177a4daf62ddc5e807784e7c46e
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
sx.el
|
| | |_|_|_|_|_|/ / / / / / / /
| |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Conflicts:
sx-interaction.el
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
It turns out some api objects do have a site property, except its value
is not a string, it is another object. The actual string we've been
referring to as .site is the .site.api_site_parameter
To avoid conflicts, I've renamed all our uses of .site to .site_par, and
sx-assoc-let now makes sure the object has a .site_par value, instead of
a .site value (which it may or may not have now, and is the same object
that the api refers to as site).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|