aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates')
-rw-r--r--subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__intro.txt10
-rw-r--r--subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__lack_of_full_license_headers_in_each_file.txt78
-rw-r--r--subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_copy.txt8
-rw-r--r--subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_not_displayed_on_AMO.txt3
-rw-r--r--subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/output.txt25
-rw-r--r--subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/outro.txt5
6 files changed, 0 insertions, 129 deletions
diff --git a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__intro.txt b/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__intro.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 8318161..0000000
--- a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__intro.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-I'm working as a volunteer for the Free Software Directory as an administrator. Your program
-is free software so in principle it should be listed there, and I'd like to
-add it. But it has some problems in showing what its license is.
-Would you please fix them, for the sake of users and other developers?
-
-Once your version with fixed license issues is public available on addons.mozilla.org_ENTRY we will review it, and if it meet our requirement I will approve http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/FSD_FULL_SOFTWARE_NAME. Once approved it will be listed on the official GNU IceCat add-on list at https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/IceCat. GNU IceCat is the GNU variant of Firefox.
-
-# Issues
-
-
diff --git a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__lack_of_full_license_headers_in_each_file.txt b/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__lack_of_full_license_headers_in_each_file.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 9aa890e..0000000
--- a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__lack_of_full_license_headers_in_each_file.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-## Lack of full license headers in each file
-
-There are no (full) license notices in the non-trivial source files
-
-The source files in FULL_SOFTWARE_NAME don't have notices saying you are the copyright
-holder and/or that they are released under LICENSE LICENSE_VERSION.
-I'm writing to ask you to please put a notice on each nontrivial source file.
-
-Selecting a license on a website that hosts the add-on (like addons.mozilla.org), will only show it there, the source files won't be modified.
-
-First, here's why license notices are needed.
-
-The purpose of a license notice is to state formally that a certain
-file may be used under the terms of a particular license.
-
-The LICENSE, like most free software licenses, applies to whatever
-material is released under that license. It does not say anything
-about which programs are released that way.
-
-Therefore, simply including a copy of the LICENSE with some code
-does not release the code under the terms of the LICENSE.
-To do that, you need a license notice, which says, more or less,
-"We the copyright holders release this code under the LICENSE."
-
-The source files should be accompanied by a copyright notice, which says who
-"we" copyright holders are. That takes the form "Copyright YEAR NAME".
-
-For the LICENSE, there are two other reasons for a license notice: to say
-which version of the LICENSE applies, and (for LICENSE LICENSE_VERSION), to say whether the
-LICENSE's option of GPL compatibility applies. It is enabled by default
-in LICENSE LICENSE_VERSION, but users should have an explicit statement of where things
-stand for any particular code. The license notice is where you
-specify this.
-
-Why should the license notice be on _each_ source file?
-Because doing it at the package level is error-prone.
-
-In the free software community, it is not unusual to copy a file from
-a free program into some other context. If the source file doesn't
-have its own license notice, then its licensing comes from the
-original context. In the other context, its licensing may not be
-clear. It may not be stated at all, or it could be stated wrong. For
-instance, what if the other program says, "This program is released
-under Apache 2.0", or "This program is released under GNU GPL, version
-3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation."
-
-The result would be to misinform users about the file's licensing.
-
-People sometimes copy part of a file, too. If the file has a license
-notice, people know to preserve that notice when copying part of the
-file's code. Otherwise, the licensing will probably get lost.
-
-A different problem can happen if you copy code _into_ FULL_SOFTWARE_NAME from
-some other package. Your package-level license notice would say it is
-under LICENSE LICENSE_VERSION, but what if it actually carries some other license,
-such as Apache 2.0, or GPL Version 3 or later?
-
-Keeping a license notice in each file is the way to reliably show
-users what their rights are. Please don't let uncertainty creep in.
-
-You've made a decision about the license -- would you please announce
-it in a way that won't get forgotten?
-
-Other people can use your work with bad intentions, even if the mistake were honestly
-unintentional. That is why, unfortunately, we have to take lots of time with verifying
-the legality of everything.
-
-See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html for how to apply license notices.
-
-
-# Licenseutils
-* sudo apt-get install licenseutils
-* Licenseutils [0.0.8 can edit .js](https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?49441#comment24) files (see [patch](http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/licenseutils.git/commit/?id=0d365160cc0fb6d0ed5eb26cf6e762278867e653)). If you use a earlier version you need to temporary rename your .js files to .cpp (Javascript comments are the same as c++) until JS have been implemented (see [fix](https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?49441)) and then rename them back to .js.
-* Run this but with your name/copyright year/license: licensing notice -c 'Yoyodyne,\ Inc.\ 2001' -l gpl -s c -n *.cpp
-
-# References
-These issues are compatible with the policy listed in [Free Software Directory, Requirements](https://directory.fsf.org/wiki?title=Free_Software_Directory:Requirements).
-
diff --git a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_copy.txt b/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_copy.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index f817164..0000000
--- a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_copy.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-## No full copy of the license file included
-
-There are no full copy of the license file
-
-The root directory don't have a file called COPYING with a copy of the software license. A plain text version of LICENSE LICENSE_VERSION
-can be found here: LICENSE_LINK
-
-
diff --git a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_not_displayed_on_AMO.txt b/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_not_displayed_on_AMO.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 5c2f135..0000000
--- a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/issue__license_not_displayed_on_AMO.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-## License not displayed on AMO
-addons.mozilla.org_ENTRY do not list "Released under".
-
diff --git a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/output.txt b/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/output.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 3059065..0000000
--- a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/output.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-I'm working as a volunteer for the Free Software Directory as an administrator. Your program
-is free software so in principle it should be listed there, and I'd like to
-add it. But it has some problems in showing what its license is.
-Would you please fix them, for the sake of users and other developers?
-
-Once your version with fixed license issues is public available on we will review it, and if it meet our requirement I will approve http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Wayback_Machine. Once approved it will be listed on the official GNU IceCat add-on list at https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/IceCat. GNU IceCat is the GNU variant of Firefox.
-
-See https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/librejs/ if you want to study a well licensed add-on.
-
-# Issues
-
-
-## No full copy of the license file included
-
-There are no full copy of the license file
-
-The root directory don't have a COPYING file with a copy of the software license. A plain text version of GPL 3.0
-can be found here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt
-
-
-# Release notes
-
-Please mention in your release notes for the upcomming version that
-your software now is properly licensed as free software.
-
diff --git a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/outro.txt b/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/outro.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index d8d420d..0000000
--- a/subprojects/freeamo/src/unmaintained/sync-data/Text_templates/outro.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-# Release notes
-
-Please mention in your release notes for the upcomming version that
-your software now is properly licensed as free software.
-