aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYuchen Pei <me@ypei.me>2018-12-02 18:12:05 +0100
committerYuchen Pei <me@ypei.me>2018-12-02 18:12:05 +0100
commite93d7bf56c31be90c21da54869116841b47d5f3e (patch)
tree0fa5f3e26871fdc594267c05a08ba731a37fdee0
parent78223d4d17f600390aa61ddf139b63de5887c95d (diff)
minor
-rw-r--r--posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md b/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md
index 5b95e26..47f4ac2 100644
--- a/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md
+++ b/posts/2018-12-02-lime-shapley.md
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ __Acknowledgement__. Thanks to Josef Lindman Hörnlund for bringing the LIME
and SHAP papers to my attention. The research is done while working at KTH
mathematics department.
+_If you are reading on a mobile device, you may need to "request desktop site"
+for equations to be properly displayed. This post is licensed under CC BY-SA._
+
Shapley values
--------------
@@ -124,7 +127,7 @@ Shapley values and LIME
-----------------------
The connection between the Shapley values and LIME is noted in
-Lundberg-Lee (2016), but the underlying connection goes back to 1988
+Lundberg-Lee (2017), but the underlying connection goes back to 1988
(Charnes et. al.).
To see the connection, we need to modify LIME a bit.