aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/microposts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYuchen Pei <me@ypei.me>2018-05-14 13:35:08 +0200
committerYuchen Pei <me@ypei.me>2018-05-14 13:35:08 +0200
commit6b19a185cd83eb36a6f6b0e741542d2cd03a3617 (patch)
treeca15e78b10bc573839a9bf50c5e394705e7be117 /microposts
parentb13ea99e7a04066d912808579d4765530e78c794 (diff)
minor edit
Diffstat (limited to 'microposts')
-rw-r--r--microposts/open-review-net.md9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/microposts/open-review-net.md b/microposts/open-review-net.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e219eb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/microposts/open-review-net.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+date: 2018-05-14
+---
+
+### Open peer review
+
+Open peer review means peer review process where communications e.g. comments and responses are public.
+
+Like [SciPost](https://scipost.org/) mentioned in [my post](/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.html), [OpenReview.net](https://openreview.net) is an example of open peer review in research. It looks like their focus is machine learning. Their [about page](https://openreview.net/about) states their mission, and here's [an example](https://openreview.net/group?id=ICLR.cc/2018/Conference) where you can click on each entry to see what it is like. We definitely need this in the maths research community.