aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/posts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYuchen Pei <me@ypei.me>2018-04-28 17:38:56 +0200
committerYuchen Pei <me@ypei.me>2018-04-28 17:38:56 +0200
commitda51d3fbbdf2cbf9fee196682235060f31781c1c (patch)
tree976e1f452320ccfa72c3a9d93a2f39fa8f6453ee /posts
parentcc81c2ed90cf51053c3c7d2e3d07c079faaf590a (diff)
minor edits
Diffstat (limited to 'posts')
-rw-r--r--posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md b/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md
index 93f9fd8..e0acb64 100644
--- a/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md
+++ b/posts/2018-04-10-update-open-research.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
template: post
-date: 2018-04-13
+date: 2018-04-28
title: Updates on open research
---
@@ -64,4 +64,4 @@ During the workshop many efforts for open research were mentioned, and afterward
In a conversation during the workshop, one of the participants called open science "normal science", because reproducibility, open access, collaborations, and fair attributions are all what science is supposed to be, and practices like treating the readers as buyers rather than users should be called "bad science", rather than "closed science".
-To which an organiser replied: maybe we should rename the workshop to "Not-bad science". \ No newline at end of file
+To which an organiser replied: maybe we should rename the workshop "Not-bad science". \ No newline at end of file